[BITList] Fighting Islamic Terrorism
FA
franka at iinet.net.au
Sun Jun 11 01:19:56 BST 2017
Professor David Flint, AM, has made some specific suggestions (writing
in the Spectator).
His suggested agenda seems to be better than that of our governments.
His suggestions:
*At War: 10 Point Plan Against Terrorism**
David Flint
Spectator Australia 3 June 2017*
**
Australia, along with all of the West, is at war. The enemy is Islamic
terrorism. What should we be doing? Here are ten suggestions
.
*First*, the politicians should no longer preside over immigration with
the negligence and gross incompetence that they have so appallingly
displayed in the past. This extends to the refugee intake, whatever the
Bingley Award winning ASIO chief Duncan Lewis thinks. To come into our
Commonwealth, they should positively demonstrate they will contribute
and become loyal Australians, with the great gift of Australian
citizenship no longer be distributed like confetti.
*Second*, we should stop jihadists fighters from ever returning return
to Australia. Nor should we seek their extradition. Rather, we should,
with our allies, ensure if not their destruction, their capture.
*Third*, we should encourage the Americans to take captured jihadists to
Guantánamo Bay, a great achievement of the Bush presidency. This solved
the problem President Clinton encountered when the FBI warned him it was
pointless to arrest Osama bin Laden as any resulting prosecution in
America would be doomed. This was because much of the strong
intelligence evidence against him would have been technically
inadmissible. Despite its great success, President Obama planned to
close the centre. Unsuccessful in that, he released a number of
detainees; a large number returned to terrorism.
*Fourth*, given the way the pendulum in the criminal justice system has
moved excessively towards protecting the accused, we should ensure that
strong intelligence evidence is admissiblein terrorist prosecutions. And
on conviction, it is crucial that terrorists be kept in remote separate
prisons so they cannot infect other prisoners.
*Fifth*, jihadists who are reasonably likely to be dual nationals should
have their Australian citizenship revoked. There is the problem of those
who are able to prove that they are definitely only Australian citizens
and have managed to return. At the present time, the authorities can
detain suspects for up to 14 days. During the Second World War, enemy
aliens, as well as locals believed on good evidence to be engaging in
treasonable practices, were subject to internment under the defence
power in the constitution.
*Sixth*, there are today a number of persons at liberty but who are
believed on strong intelligence evidence to be planning to engage in
terrorist acts, as was the Manchester suicide bomber Salman Abedi. Given
that we are clearly at war, is it not time consider internment as a
legitimate defence to protect the civil population? It must never be
forgotten that the primary duty of government is to defend the borders,
to maintain law and order and to protect the citizenry from hostilities
and crime.
*Seventh*, calls for the reintroduction of the death penalty deserve to
be considered seriously. The constitutional intention is that this be
decided by each jurisdiction, state or federal. But in 2010, federal
legislation, based of course on a UN treaty, tries to stop the states
from re-introducing the penalty. What total abolitionists forget is that
in wartime, we can hardly expect our soldiers to risk their lives for
their country while traitors are protected at home. In wartime,
countries normally visit such offences with the supreme penalty,
execution. (Incidentally, that gentle soul Tori Johnson was not
'executed' in the Lindt cafe siege. He was brutally murdered.)
There were however glaring exceptions to this normal behaviour of the
authorities in the Second World War when, as Hal Colebatch has
demonstrated, an extraordinary number of instances of treachery were
committed by communists with complete impunity, especially on the
waterfront. This can be best explained by the action of the Left in
blocking the emergence of an all-party coalition as in the UK. A
Curtin-Menzies government would have acted against the traitors who
undermined the war effort and endangered the lives of our service men
and women.
*Eighth*, we must eliminate any no-go areas where parts of Australia or
indeed family units operate under sharia law in contradiction to the law
of the land. Whether this be emerging mini-caliphates as in France, or
in the toleration of welfare subsidised polygamy, child marriage, female
genital mutilation, the wearing of the veil and segregated swimming
pools, no deviation should be allowed.
*Ninth*, the subsidy of terrorism through foreign aid, welfare, grants
or through the milking of school funds should end. Only schools
committed to the Australian system and values should be subsidised or
indeed permitted.
*Tenth*, what is effectively an halal tax should be declared illegal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com/pipermail/bitlist/attachments/20170611/c320ab44/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the BITList
mailing list