[BITList] BOP's
FS
franka at iinet.net.au
Mon May 10 15:23:03 BST 2010
Hugh
I wouldnt fancy being on the rig trying to land the the back up stack,
it used to be bad enough trying to do a re-entry on a well after we had
unlatched and moved off due to bad weather but we were only trying to
latch on with the riser which had a re-entry cone plus subsea tv along
with a transmitter beacons on the stack and receivers on the riser,
suppose they can use the ROV's to fit these but in this case they will
be dangling a stack over a producing well and doing it blind with all
the rubbish coming out of the well Ive watched Red Adare and Boots &
Coots do it a couple of times in Indonesia with varying success and that
was on land rigs it would be like sitting on a bomb up to on the rig
frank
On 5/10/2010 3:50 PM, HUGH wrote:
> Frank,
>
> Many thanks for that - it all comes back. On p20 the height relative to a
> man can be seen. In addition to this, there is a Lower Riser Package on top
> of the BOP.
>
> > From a website :
> http://dailyhurricane.com/2010/05/bp-starts-talking-about-blowout-well---sort-of.html
>
> ...... BP engineers did begin talking in various industry interviews.
> Upstream Online reported that they have learned, apparently from Charlie
> Holt, BP's head of drilling and completion in the Gulf, several very
> important new bits of information. First, they report that BP has indeed
> been able to trigger all six sets of rams on the BOP after making hydraulic
> repairs to the stack, but that the action did not successfully shut the well
> in. That's new information. BP did concede, however, that erosion to the
> seals and damage prevented it from sealing, as we had speculated yesterday.
> They also reported on more detail about a risky plan of stabbing a new BOP
> stack on top of the old one.
>
> This plan ties to information I had picked up a couple of days ago that they
> were planning to cut the riser above the stack. If the cut is successful,
> they could then detach from the lower riser package connector, giving them a
> latching mechanism looking up to land the new BOPs. The risk, of course, is
> making the flow worse by reducing line restrictions provided by the
> destroyed riser, but isolates the leak to one source that could be then
> controlled. If they can land that BOP, they could shut the well in, then
> kill it by pumping heavy mud through the kill line.
>
> Hugh.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from this email List, send an email to:
> BITList-unsubscribe at lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com
>
> BITList mailing list
> BITList at lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com
> http://lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com/mailman/listinfo/bitlist
>
>
>
More information about the BITList
mailing list