[BITList] one in three Americans — either in poverty or in the fretful zone just above it.

x50type at cox.net x50type at cox.net
Sat Nov 19 15:33:03 GMT 2011


        With only 100 million people either in poverty or in the fretful zone just above it, the US can easily afford to reduce taxes on the richest 1% and give them more - the other 99% are just whiners protesting about falling wages, a poorer standard of living, no health insurance and uncaring/corrupt politicians fiddling while Rome burns.............................
        Sheesh...........!!
        ct 

        Older, Suburban and Struggling, ‘Near Poor’ Startle the Census
          
        Doug Mills/The New York Times


        WASHINGTON — They drive cars, but seldom new ones. They earn paychecks, but not big ones. Many own homes. Most pay taxes. Half are married, and nearly half live in the suburbs. None are poor, but many describe themselves as barely scraping by. Down but not quite out, these Americans form a diverse group sometimes called “near poor” and sometimes simply overlooked — and a new count suggests they are far more numerous than previously understood. 

        When the Census Bureau this month released a new measure of poverty, meant to better count disposable income, it began altering the portrait of national need. Perhaps the most startling differences between the old measure and the new involves data the government has not yet published, showing 51 million people with incomes less than 50 percent above the poverty line. That number of Americans is 76 percent higher than the official account, published in September. All told, that places 100 million people — one in three Americans — either in poverty or in the fretful zone just above it. 

        After a lost decade of flat wages and the worst downturn since the Great Depression, the findings can be thought of as putting numbers to the bleak national mood — quantifying the expressions of unease erupting in protests and political swings. They convey levels of economic stress sharply felt but until now hard to measure. 

        The Census Bureau, which published the poverty data two weeks ago, produced the analysis of those with somewhat higher income at the request of The New York Times. The size of the near-poor population took even the bureau’s number crunchers by surprise. 

        “These numbers are higher than we anticipated,” said Trudi J. Renwick, the bureau’s chief poverty statistician. “There are more people struggling than the official numbers show.” 








-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com/pipermail/bitlist/attachments/20111119/243eba85/attachment.shtml 


More information about the BITList mailing list