[BITList] cost cutting

[CT's]

hugh

BP - awkward bastards indeed.....................could there be a BP policy rewarding AB's who can cut corners, as in this BP explosion?
But - politically, the disastrous years of bush and the republican party policy of doing everything possible to help business make even bigger profits [in exchange for huge amounts of money to bush, cheney and co. - normally referred to as BRIBES but termed "contributions" in the political arena] have resulted in lower safety standards across the board - because the cost of safety and prudence cuts into profits.
oil company drilling and refining standards are lower here than the rest of the world, lax banking/financial standards on wall street resulted in the near collapse in 2008 of the worlds financial system, lowered and ignored standards in the airline industry resulting a number of crashes, lowered and ignored standards in the mining industry have resulted in a number of coal mining accidents in the last 4 or 5 years and let's not forget the medical insurance companies who are/were allowed to cherry pick policy holders and drop those who had the temerity to become ill and make a claim  - and on and on.
In this toxic atmosphere of profit before life, it is no wonder BP likes doing business here............................but calls themselves BEYOND PETROLEUM. 
Law suits have already been filed claiming BP negligence in this matter - penny pinching on safety will cost BP billions.

ct



From: HUGH 
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:51 PM
To: bitlist at lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com 
Subject: Re: [BITList] bp cost cutting


Colin,

Though I can't say if it was the start of the trend towards a lean and expertise-deficient BP, I witnessed evidence of early cost-cutting by them.  When Lithgow / Kincaid built the oil rig support vessel ESV Iolair for BP at the start of the 80s, the place was awash with high fliers.  Academic papers were written about her systems and her planning process, and the authors were among the supervisors.  Finicky wasn't the word for them - there was no room for fudging - every last bit of every circuit of every section of every control system had to be described in detail for commissioning and setting up tests, every lamp, every relay, every switch.  Every system - electrical, electronic, hydraulic, mechanical - was tested on a hierarchy in the same way, separately and interlinked.  I know, for I wrote every bloody procedure and spent 31 days on her first sea trials.

Fast forward a few years, still in the 80s, and the same people were building a tanker, British Spirit, for BP, one of three.  She wasn't the lead ship, but she was finished first.  She wasn't anywhere near as complex a vessel, but they were still as finicky, at least the supers standing by her were.  Indeed, they were more than finicky, they were a pain in the arse at times. They measured the number of threads sticking above a nut and rejected the bolt if they stuck out more than they thought decent.  Then they would bargain, trade this fault for something else.  Bloody minded, but playing by the rules - everything they demanded was a strict interpretation of the spec. The reason for all this emerged eventually - when she was handed over, redundancies would take place, so any means of delaying her were fair game.   They only relaxed on her sea trials, indeed they ran fuel consumption tests in parallel with ours, and got a better specific consumption - the financial penalty for exceeding the contract fuel consumption was hefty.  On deck one afternoon the head super asked me if we were doing inerting tests on the tanks, to show the distribution of the inert gas.  With the Iolair, they would already have clocked the absence of a test procedure in print and sent a gunboat.  I told him no such procedure had been worked out in the time available, since I hadn't a clue how to guarantee it, but certain rudimentary notions had occurred to me.  "OK," he said, "We'll have a go."  So we scrabbled around for a couple of hours, before he agreed with me that it was a difficult problem that would require resources we didn't have.  He signed it off anyway in token of my effort.

Hugh.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe from this email List, send an email to:
BITList-unsubscribe at lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com

BITList mailing list
BITList at lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com
http://lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com/mailman/listinfo/bitlist

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com/pipermail/bitlist/attachments/20100430/296fb42b/attachment-0001.shtml