[BITList] More on 1549
John Feltham
wulguru.wantok at gmail.com
Thu Feb 26 06:08:28 GMT 2009
Congress Hears From Hudson Controller, Captain, And Crew
On Capitol Hill on Tuesday, Patrick Harten, the air traffic controller
who was on duty the day US Airways Flight 1549 ditched in the Hudson,
spoke about the event publicly for the first time. He told members of
the House Subcommittee on Aviation that when he heard Capt. Chesley
"Sully" Sullenberger tell him, "We're gonna be in the Hudson," he
asked him to repeat himself, even though he heard him just fine. "I
simply could not wrap my mind around those words," Harten said calmly.
"People don't survive landings on the Hudson River, and I thought this
was a death sentence. I believed at that moment, I was going to be the
last person to talk to anyone on that plane alive." Harten said that
during the emergency itself, he was hyper-focused. "I had no choice
but to think and act quickly, and remain calm. But when it was over,
it hit me hard. It felt like hours before I learned about the heroic
water landing that Captain Sullenberger and his crew had managed. Even
after I learned the truth, I could not shake the image of tragedy in
my mind. ... I felt like I had been hit by a bus." Harten will return
to work later this week for the first time since the ditching. The
panel also heard from Capt. Sullenberger, who warned that airlines of
the future may not be as safe as airlines today. "I am worried that
the airline-piloting profession will not be able to continue to
attract the best and the brightest," Sullenberger said. "The current
experience and skills of our country's professional airline pilots
come from investments made years ago when we were able to attract the
ambitious, talented people who now frequently seek lucrative
professional careers elsewhere," he said. "I do not know a single
professional airline pilot who wants his or her children to follow in
their footsteps."
His pay has been cut by 40 percent in recent years and his pension has
been downgraded, he said. This may not be news to those of us in the
aviation world, but it will be interesting to see if America's
favorite pilot can get the attention of the public and Congress by
making clear that the economic changes that have made airline pilots'
careers less appealing may ultimately affect safety. "Americans have
experienced huge economic difficulties in recent months, but airline
employees have been experiencing those challenges and more for eight
years," Sullenberger said. "We've been hit by an economic tsunami,
September 11, bankruptcies, fluctuating fuel prices, mergers, loss of
pensions and revolving-door management teams who have used airline
employees as an ATM.... The single most important piece of safety
equipment is an experienced, well-trained pilot."
The panel, whose purpose was to examine what safety issues may have
been revealed by the ditching, also heard from the rest of the US
Airways crew and several officials from the aviation industry and
regulatory agencies. During discussions, the panel suggested they
might review rules regarding what airplanes must be equipped with life
rafts, whether passengers should be instructed to stay away from the
rear exits in the event of a water landing, and if the labor laws that
govern the airlines should be separated from those that govern the
railroads. In response to questions about the birds, Sullenberger said
he believed the collision that shut down both engines was likely a
"fluke," and it would be difficult in any case to reduce or control
bird populations. He did say that it would be worthwhile to review
engine certification standards in regard to bird strikes. Robert
Sumwalt, of the NTSB, said those standards will be reviewed as part of
the board's ongoing investigation into the accident.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com/pipermail/bitlist/attachments/20090226/27d5c665/attachment.shtml
More information about the BITList
mailing list